Though it is not as wide as 16mm, but the range is very useful to cover the wedding, portraits, candid, and close up. It has in between 1:3 to 1:4 close up magnification. I would prefer this lens as a single lens when compared to 16-50 or other variants. Its strength is on its sharpness, very reasonable bokeh and it is quite sharp in my books for wide open shots. I pretend to be a wedding photog in my friends' wedding using Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 along with Komine 135mm f/2.8 1:2 Macro & Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4
Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
#1
#2
#3
I have to chop off half body as I can't
interfere the main photog with a knelled down position
on the sideline
#4
#5
#6
the candid shot available only from amateur photog
the real photog are shooting the front, of course
More Wedding Shots with
Komine 135mm f/2.8 1:2 Macro &
Pentax FA 50mm f/1.4
The good copy of DA* 16-50 would be a better lens. But if I have to pick one lens to cover a broader range, I would pick the Tamron zoom again. If your emphasis is on group shot versus portraits, then I would pick the DA* 16-50 over the Tamron.
Related:
- Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8
- Tamron 28-75mm on Portraits
- Tamron 28-75mm on Fireworks
- Komine 135mm f/2.8 1:2 Macro
- Hin's Camera Gear
0 comments:
Post a Comment